IARC 60th Anniversary - 19-21 May 2026
Session : 19/05/26 - Posters
Screening and Prevention Technologies: Advancing Equitable Partnerships and LMIC-Led Decision-Making
ASAFA H. 1
1 Nigeria Correctional Service, FCT ABUJA, Nigeria
Background
Correctional facilities face elevated risks of communicable diseases, mental health disorders, substance abuse, and security-related health emergencies. Effective screening and prevention technologies are critical to safeguarding inmates, staff, and surrounding communities. As a Correctional Officer with experience in intelligence, security operations, and institutional control, I have observed the direct impact of delayed detection, limited preventive systems, and weak inter-agency coordination on public safety and correctional health outcomes.
Objectives
This work aims to highlight the importance of structured screening and prevention approaches within correctional settings, with a focus on strengthening early detection, reducing health and security risks, and improving decision-making through coordinated partnerships. The objective is also to emphasize practitioner-led input, particularly from frontline officers, in shaping policies and operational frameworks.
Methods
The summary draws on professional experience in correctional operations, security monitoring, inmate supervision, and inter-agency collaboration. Observational assessment of routine screening practices, incident reporting systems, and preventive control measures was combined with applied knowledge of risk assessment, intelligence gathering, and compliance enforcement. Emphasis was placed on practical, low-resource, and scalable approaches suitable for constrained institutional environments.
Results
Effective screening and prevention measures—such as routine health and behavioral screening, risk profiling, early-warning reporting systems, and structured staff training—were found to significantly reduce security incidents, disease transmission, and emergency responses. Collaboration between correctional leadership, health units, security personnel, and external partners improved compliance, trust, and response time. Frontline officer involvement enhanced operational relevance and sustainability of interventions.
Conclusions/Implications for Practice or Policy
Screening and prevention technologies must be integrated into correctional policy as core security and public health tools. Decision-making should be informed by frontline correctional officers who understand institutional realities. Policies should prioritize early detection, continuous monitoring, staff capacity building, and cross-sector collaboration. Strengthening correctional screening systems contributes not only to institutional safety but also to national public health, rehabilitation outcomes, and long-term community security.